The Triumph Tracker 400, Thruxton 400 and the Joy of Enough

Motorcycles

White

The Triumph Tracker 400, Thruxton 400 and the Joy of Enough

27 August, 2026

Words by:

Justin Jackie

Two motorcycles built from almost the same ingredients are a useful reminder that specifications only tell you so much.

There are probably more sensible ways to spend a freezing Wednesday morning in Victoria than riding a 400cc motorcycle through intermittent sleet. But standing outside a Triumph pop-up on Brunswick Street in Fitzroy, surrounded by a slightly unusual collection of motorcycle journalists, content creators and a comedian, sensible didn’t seem particularly important.

The whole thing had already felt a little different from the usual motorcycle launch. Triumph had put us up at The Standard X around the corner, where the presentation and dinner the night before felt more like something you might expect from a design brand than the familiar routine of a motorcycle manufacturer. Afterwards we wandered down Brunswick Street to the pop-up, and by the following morning the formalities had largely disappeared. We were just a bunch of people trying to work out how many layers we could fit underneath motorcycle jackets before heading out of Melbourne for the day, and the motorcycles waiting for us seemed particularly well suited to the occasion.

The Tracker 400 and Thruxton 400 are the newest additions to Triumph’s rapidly expanding 400cc family, joining the Speed 400 and Scrambler 400 X and XC. If you were being cynical, you could look at the specifications and assume Triumph had simply found two more outfits for the same motorcycle. Both use the same 398cc single-cylinder engine, here given a revised camshaft, timing and engine tune that lifts peak power from 40 to 42PS and lets it spin another 1,000rpm. Both make the same 37.5Nm of torque, use six-speed gearboxes, ride-by-wire throttles and four-piston radial front brake calipers, and there are only three kilograms separating them on the scales. Yet parked together in Fitzroy, they already felt like very different propositions.

The Tracker is wide-barred, upright and covered in the sort of graphics that suggest someone in Triumph’s design department had been watching old American flat-track footage. The Thruxton sits lower and sleeker, with clip-ons, a little cockpit fairing, bar-end mirrors and enough café-racer theatre to make its $10,390 rideaway price seem slightly improbable.

I started the day on the Tracker, and getting out of Melbourne gave me plenty of time to settle into it before the roads became interesting. The first thing I noticed wasn’t the extra two horsepower or revised engine tune, but simply how naturally I fitted on the thing. At 190cm, smaller motorcycles can sometimes make me feel as though I’ve accidentally borrowed somebody else’s bike, but the Tracker never did. The bars are broad, the riding position upright and the footpegs sit far enough rearward to keep you involved without folding your legs into an uncomfortable shape. Triumph talks about an “elbows out” riding position borrowed from flat track, which sounds slightly theatrical in a presentation, but on the road it translates into something much simpler: you feel relaxed, in control and ready to throw the bike around a little.

That position suits the Tracker’s personality because there is an element of larrikin about the whole thing. The number boards, flyscreen, blocky Pirelli MT60 RS tyres and mud-splatter graphics could very easily have crossed the line into trying too hard, but the whole package feels sufficiently tongue-in-cheek that it gets away with it. Neither of these motorcycles seems particularly interested in historical reenactment. They borrow heavily from familiar motorcycle archetypes, but there is enough humour in the execution that they land somewhere between homage and hysterical without tumbling into either.

As Melbourne gradually gave way to more open roads, the Tracker became increasingly difficult to fault as an everyday motorcycle. It was happy trickling through traffic, happy sitting at road speeds and happier again once there were corners to play with. Within Triumph’s existing 400 range, it feels like it lands somewhere between the Speed and Scrambler, taking some of the upright control and visual attitude of the latter without going as far down the adventure-bike path. If anything, it might be the most pragmatic of the lot.

The weather was doing its best to test that theory. What began as a cold Victorian morning became the sort of day where patches of sleet periodically appeared and you started wondering whether your gloves were actually waterproof or merely something the manufacturer had suggested in the marketing copy. But there is something about a small motorcycle that makes miserable weather slightly less miserable. The Tracker was light and unintimidating beneath me, the controls were easy, the throttle mapping crisp, and there was never much mental bandwidth being spent managing the motorcycle itself. I could concentrate on the road, the weather and the increasingly questionable decision to leave the hotel that morning.

It also became a useful reminder that 42 horsepower can be plenty. Triumph has deliberately moved the character of this latest version of the TR-series engine further up the rev range, with peak power now arriving at 9,000rpm and peak torque at 7,500rpm. Compared with the Scrambler 400s I’ve ridden previously, there is a slightly peakier feeling as you chase the engine towards the top, encouraging you to keep winding it out, although once you’re there the single-cylinder engine is also vibrating enthusiastically enough to make sure you know about it.

On paper, that might sound like a criticism, but on the road it contributes to what I can only describe as fast drama. The engine gets busier, the sound becomes more urgent, vibrations start working their way through the motorcycle and the relatively small chassis makes everything feel as though it is happening with considerable intensity. You can be using a meaningful amount of what the engine has to offer without travelling at a speed that immediately turns a pleasant Wednesday into a conversation with Victoria Police.

There is an old cliché that it is more fun to ride a slow bike fast than a fast bike slowly, and like most clichés it survives because there is something annoyingly true about it. The Tracker gives you plenty to do. You can work through the gearbox, keep the engine in the energetic part of the rev range, move around on the motorcycle and generally feel involved in the process. More power would make it faster, obviously, but I’m not convinced it would necessarily make the experience better. For this sort of motorcycle, and at this sort of price, 42 horsepower feels about right.

By the time we reached Healesville for lunch, the cold had made stopping seem like a particularly good idea. Helmets came off, gloves were abandoned somewhere warm and the morning started being compared over food. What had initially been a fairly eclectic media group now felt more like a bunch of friends out for a ride, united mostly by the fact that everybody had underestimated how cold Victoria could be. After lunch, I swapped onto the Thruxton.

It is worth saying before anything else that the Thruxton 400 is a gorgeous little motorcycle. I had thought so standing beside it in Fitzroy, but after spending the morning looking at the Tracker’s deliberately brash graphics, there was something particularly appealing about the Thruxton’s restraint. The little fairing gives the front end far more presence than you expect at this price, while the sculpted tank, seat cowl, bar-end mirrors and Monza-style fuel cap are exactly the sort of unnecessary details that make ownership enjoyable. It is the kind of bike that would still make you smile when you caught sight of it after parking.

The Thruxton name obviously brings some history with it, and Triumph describes this bike as a reinterpretation of that café-racer lineage for a new generation. You could spend a long time debating whether a 398cc single-cylinder motorcycle deserves to wear the same name as larger and considerably faster Thruxtons of the past, but I suspect doing so means you’ve slightly missed the point. This entire platform works because it doesn’t take itself too seriously. The Thruxton isn’t pretending to be a scaled-down historic racing motorcycle; it is borrowing a visual language people already understand and using it to make an affordable motorcycle more desirable.

The problem, at least for me, became obvious fairly quickly after leaving Healesville: I was simply too big for it. Triumph has dropped the Thruxton’s clip-on handlebars substantially compared with the Speed 400 and moved the footpegs rearward and upward, and when combined with the different tank and seat, that completely changes how your body interacts with what is otherwise a very similar motorcycle.

My knees met the tank in a different place, more weight travelled through my arms and my head and neck sat at a different angle. The lower riding position shifted my centre of gravity and made the bike feel sportier before I’d even reached the first decent corner. None of those things is inherently bad. In fact, when the road opened into faster, sweeping corners, the Thruxton began making much more sense. Suddenly there was a reason to be tucked forward behind that little fairing, and the Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV tyres offered a slightly stickier feeling at the edge than the Tracker’s more visually adventurous MT60 RS rubber. There is possibly a psychological benefit to leaning a café racer onto a tyre wearing an Italian performance marque too, but motorcycles have never been entirely rational objects.

The problem was simply that my body didn’t agree with the arrangement for very long. Someone shorter might climb onto the same Thruxton and think it is perfect, while someone else who is also 190cm but has shorter legs, longer arms or a greater tolerance for weight through their wrists might have no problem at all. Triumph itself describes the riding position as surprisingly accommodating for taller riders, and I’m sure for some it will be. It just wasn’t for me, and the more I rode it, the more interesting that became because almost nothing else about the motorcycle had fundamentally changed.

The engine still made 42PS. The brakes felt much the same. The clutch and six-speed gearbox remained smooth and unobtrusive, while the ride-by-wire mapping was crisp enough that I never found myself thinking about fuelling. Triumph gives the Thruxton five millimetres less front suspension travel than the Tracker, but claiming that was the defining difference between the two would be splitting hairs. Even their wet weights are separated by only three kilograms. The thing that really changed the motorcycle was where Triumph put me on it.

We spend a lot of time comparing motorcycles through numbers because numbers are wonderfully easy to compare. Horsepower can be placed beside horsepower. Weight can be measured to the kilogram. Suspension travel can be reduced to millimetres and seat height becomes a convenient shorthand for whether a motorcycle might fit you.

We are also becoming increasingly accustomed to buying things without ever physically interacting with them. A few reviews, some YouTube videos, a comparison tool and an online configurator can create the feeling that we know exactly what we’re getting. For plenty of products, perhaps we do. Motorcycles remain wonderfully resistant to that kind of instant gratification because your body is effectively one of their components.

Where your knees land matters. The length of your torso matters. Your arms matter. Where your weight ends up after an hour matters, and even the roads between your house and work matter. It makes the apparently old-fashioned process of visiting a dealership, sitting on a motorcycle and actually taking it for a test ride more important than ever. The Thruxton wasn’t a worse motorcycle than the Tracker because it didn’t fit me. It was simply the wrong motorcycle for my particular collection of limbs, and no amount of research beforehand would have told me that as clearly as twenty minutes in the saddle.

The same applies to how these bikes fit into someone’s life. The Tracker is remarkably difficult to pigeonhole. I could imagine a new rider buying one as their first proper motorcycle, an experienced rider using one as a cheap daily, someone commuting across a city on it, or someone keeping one around simply because a light 400 is an easy thing to grab the keys for. Age, gender and experience don’t seem particularly important, and its riding position should accommodate a fairly broad range of bodies.

The Thruxton asks a few more questions. Does it fit you? What does your commute look like? Are there enough open roads in your life to make that tucked position worthwhile? Are you happy accepting a little less everyday comfort because every time you open the garage you’re going to see that fairing? For the right person, those aren’t necessarily compromises at all.

By the afternoon, with Fitzroy gradually becoming our destination again, I’d arrived at a fairly simple conclusion about both bikes. The Tracker was the one I could most easily live with, even if I would still personally edge towards the Scrambler 400 because it resonates with me in a slightly different way. The Thruxton was the one I’d probably rather have sitting in the corner of the garage to look at, provided my body was better suited to actually riding it.

Both also felt appropriately priced. At $9,990 rideaway for the Tracker and $10,390 for the Thruxton, Triumph has landed in an interesting middle ground. Charge much more and I’d start wanting stronger brakes, more power and perhaps another layer of sophistication from the suspension. Go much cheaper and the cohesive paint, metal finishes and little design details would presumably be among the first things to disappear. There are a few chrome-look parts I’d be curious to revisit after several years living near the coast, but otherwise neither motorcycle constantly reminds you that it occupies the affordable end of Triumph’s range.

Eventually we rolled back into Fitzroy and the little Triumph pop-up we’d left that morning. The weather hadn’t miraculously improved, my hands had spent much of the day colder than I would have liked, and I had learned fairly conclusively that a Thruxton 400 wasn’t designed around somebody shaped exactly like me. None of that stopped it being an excellent day, which after thinking about it for a while might be the most useful observation I brought home.

We are very good at convincing ourselves that enjoyment improves in proportion to capability. A faster motorcycle should be more exciting, a faster car more desirable, a better camera needs more resolution and a bigger house means you’ve done better. More power, more technology, more space, more features, more whatever. There is always another number available to move upwards, and entire industries exist to convince us that doing so will make the experience on the other side of the purchase correspondingly better.

Sometimes it does, but often the relationship is nowhere near that simple. Motorcycles are particularly good at exposing the flaw in the logic because the sensation of riding one has never had a particularly reliable relationship with its specification sheet. A 150-horsepower motorcycle can be extraordinary, but it can also spend most of its life asking you to exercise restraint. A little single-cylinder 400, meanwhile, lets you open the throttle, chase gears, feel the chassis beneath you and occasionally vibrate your way towards the redline without requiring a racetrack to make sense of it.

On that freezing Wednesday in Victoria, 42PS was plenty. We had ridden out of Fitzroy, chased some roads around Healesville, swapped motorcycles, complained about the weather, laughed at each other and eventually found our way back into Melbourne. Nobody needed another hundred horsepower. Nobody needed semi-active suspension or another riding mode.

Perhaps that’s the nicest thing the Tracker 400 and Thruxton 400 have in common. For all the effort Triumph has gone to in making them look and feel different, both are ultimately a reminder that more isn’t always better. Sometimes it is just more.